Youth
Electronic Tagging of Young Offenders
| This document is published for archival/historical purposes. It will not be updated. |
The Home Office Research Development and Statistics Unit published the report “Electronically monitored curfew for 10- to 15-year olds - report of the pilot” on 21 November 2000. A brief summary of the main findings of the report is given below.
The full text can be found at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/occ-tagging.pdf (
PDF, 230KB).
Summary
Between March 1998 and February 2000, 155 electronically monitored curfew orders were placed on 10 -15 year olds under an extension of powers from Section 43 of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997.
The relatively low number of orders was thought be due this type of order being effective on only a small percentage of offenders, as relatively few of the offending group have a sufficiently stable home life.
The use of these orders varied with the juveniles’ age and most of the orders were placed on boys; no orders were placed on 10-year-olds and most were made on 14- and 15-year-olds and only 10 of the 155 orders were placed on girls.
Most young offenders were curfewed for between 10 and 12 hours per day (12 hours is the most permitted in any 24-hour period). Almost all of these curfews were for the silent hours.
Two-thirds of the orders for which data was available were completed successfully without breaching. Nearly ten percent went on to complete the order after breaching and a little under a quarter failed to complete the order.
Communication between the courts, Social Services and education officials was problematic with the educational officers complaining that they had received very little information about tagging.
There were concerns at the outset of the pilot that the tag might be perceived by the offender as a trophy, but evidence to support this theory was split.
Download the report in full (
PDF, 230KB)
Last update: Thursday, August 28, 2008


