Disrupting demand and the economics of trafficking
Actions can be taken using health and safety or fire regulations,
or special treatment licences granted by local authorities for
‘sauna/massage’ parlours, to disrupt the running of certain
businesses. Equally, regular monitoring can prove a disincentive
for covert businesses.
In terms of labour exploitation, businesses which are
breaking the law under employment legislation (for example regarding
unlawful deductions from wages, or unacceptable health and safety
working conditions) or which contravene labour standards may also be
closed down. Demand in the labour markets may partially be addressed
through awareness raising amongst employers groups.
Community groups may also be targeted for awareness
raising.
Given the large amounts of money involved in the
trafficking business and that of the exploiters, it should be a
priority to try and track the flow of money and to put pressure on the
financial organisation of the traffickers. This could lead to
possibilities of asset seizure under various pieces of legislation and
for victims suing for damages. Experience indicates that this is
difficult but again guidance is available on relevant approaches. CPS
should be able to advise.
|
Back
to Top 
