Target setting checklist
1. Set targets for intended outcomes.
Targets should reflect the actions planned and what the partnership
is trying to achieve.
2. Specify what must actually happen for the desired outcome to
be achieved, detailing:
target inputs (e.g. resources in terms of staff or cash)
processes (e.g. the activities which staff will have responsibility
for)
target outputs (e.g. the immediate consequences of these activities)
milestones (stages to be reached by given dates)
These detailed targets may not need to be included in
the strategy, but having them helps partners be clear about the level of
investment and activity needed to achieve the desired result.
It also helps managers check that projects are on
course. Setting targets for, and monitoring, inputs as well as outputs
is vital for assessing the cost effectiveness of particular initiatives
and understanding why a project may not have achieved its intended
results.
3. Start from good baseline information.
Meaningful targets and good project design depend on having good
information on the scale and nature of the problem. Where there are gaps
in the baseline information, set a target date by which the data will be
obtained.
4. Estimate the impact that the activities will
have
Estimating impact is easier for some crimes than for others. Examples
of good practice can help to give a feel for the expected impact from
taking a similar course of action in similar conditions.
Running through this series of questions can help in judging where to
pitch a target:
- What is the starting position?
- What is the scale of the problem?
- What is the trend?
- How do these compare with other areas?
- What has similar activity achieved elsewhere?
- Are we planning to tackle the problem in the same way?
- Are the conditions the same?
- Are we putting in the same resources?
What else is going on that may affect performance?
- How might the target(s) be affected by other local or national
initiatives?
- How does the local target relate to national targets?
- In the case of disorder and racist incidents, police forces and
local authorities are now required, under the new duty of Best
Value, to provide information on their performance against
specific indicators.
- Has the staff providing services been consulted on the target?
- Does the target set take account of their input?
- How will staff commitment be secured?
- Is the target worthwhile?
- Will the public regard it as acceptable?
- Will achieving it be satisfying?
- Based on what has been achieved elsewhere, does it represent
value for money?
5. Consider how the target is best expressed
There are many different ways of framing targets. Some options
include:
|
- reduce the number of repeat burglaries by 200
|
|
- reduce the number of repeat burglaries by 10%
|
|
- reduce the rate of repeat burglary in Ward A to the
borough-wide average
|
- Relative to expected
- level
|
- reduce the rate of repeat burglary by 15% relative to expected
background trends
|
- Relative to
- cost/value for money
|
- save twice the amount invested in responding to repeat
burglaries
|
- Tied to a tolerance threshold
|
- reduce risk of repeat burglary arson to less than 5% threshold
|
6. Make sure the targets set are clear and unambiguous, i.e.:
- S
pecific
- M
easurable
- A
chievable
- R
ealistic
- T
imely & Timescaled
Where possible a named person should be responsible for delivering and
reporting on each target.
7.
Consider how the target might be met.
Could the target be met in ways other than those you intend? If
so, how will you check for / guard against this?
8. Consider setting targets that reflect the role of different
partners.
Targets that reflect different partners’ objectives can help in
tracking and acknowledging contributions made by different agencies.
9. Consider how the targets will be communicated to people who need to
know about them.
When, and how, will targets be built into work plans? How will the
targets be shared with a wider audience?
10. Review progress at regular intervals
Checks against the targets will help to highlight where projects
need adjusting or where targets need
revising to reflect a changing situation. The action plan may also
need revising to take account of new developments.
|