|
Cost effectiveness analysis |
8) Making a crude link between the predicted inputs of a specific
project or initiative and its outcome targets. |
Identifying predicted inputs. Using evidence of what works to set
SMART targets e.g. this burglary project will cost £100,000 and has
a target to prevent 100 burglaries. |
Could be used for basic policy appraisal in a funding bid or
strategy development process. |
Yes – relatively easy |
|
9) Undertaking cost-effectiveness analysis for a specific project
or initiative |
Identify direct and indirect inputs. Evaluate project to
ascertain crime reduction impact. Calculate cost of impact achieved. |
A form of policy evaluation that could be used to set future
priorities and allocate future funds.
Would only be undertaken on flagship projects |
Yes – although difficult and resource intensive because of need
for a good evaluation |
|
10) Undertaking cost-effectiveness analysis on mainstream service
contributions to a particular strategic priority |
Identify and distinguish each intervention contributing to a
particular strategic priority. Identify direct and indirect inputs
for each contribution. Evaluate each contribution to ascertain crime
reduction impact. Ascertain which interventions were most cost
effective. |
Could be used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different
organisations contributing to a particular strategic priority.
Could be used for a S17 / Best Value Review of crime and
disorder. |
Probably no – the type of evaluation required to identify the
impacts accruing from multiple interventions would be extremely
complex and resource intensive |